- Apple is immune under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act because it is considered a publisher of the content provided by another content provider, not a creator.
- The judge also agreed with Apple that Diep did not successfully plead claims under both California’s and Maryland’s Consumer Privacy Acts because she did not allege specific details of the time, place, and content of the alleged false representations.
- Moreover, Diep’s claims must be dismissed because under Apple’s terms and conditions, the company is not liable for damages arising out of or related to the use of third-party apps, the ruling details.
Apple Shielded From Crypto Wallet App Lawsuit, Judge Rules
